Peer review is a crucial process in maintaining the quality and integrity of scholarly publications, including the International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health Research. Below is a structured peer review process tailored for this journal:

1. Submission Receipt and Initial Screening:

   • Upon receiving a manuscript, the editorial office acknowledges receipt and performs an initial screening for adherence to submission guidelines, scope, and basic formatting requirements.

2. Editorial Evaluation:

   • The Editor-in-Chief or an assigned Editor assesses the manuscript's suitability for the journal. Factors considered include relevance to the journal's scope, originality, significance, and adherence to ethical guidelines.
   • If the manuscript meets initial criteria, it proceeds to peer review. Otherwise, authors may be notified of rejection or advised to revise and resubmit.

3. Assignment to Reviewers:

   • The Editor selects potential reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject matter. Reviewers are chosen based on their academic qualifications, research experience, and absence of conflicts of interest with the authors.
   • Reviewers' identities are kept confidential to ensure impartial evaluation.

4. Peer Review Process:

   • Reviewers critically evaluate the manuscript's content, methodology, data analysis, interpretation, and overall quality.
   • Reviewers provide constructive feedback and recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on the manuscript's merits and adherence to scholarly standards.
   • Reviewers may suggest revisions to improve clarity, rigor, relevance, and adherence to ethical guidelines.

5. Editorial Decision:

   • Based on reviewers' comments and recommendations, the Editor makes a decision regarding acceptance, rejection, or revision.
   • If revisions are requested, authors are provided with detailed feedback and asked to address reviewers' concerns within a specified timeframe.
   • Revised manuscripts may undergo further review before a final decision is reached.

6. Author Notification:

   • Authors are promptly informed of the editorial decision along with reviewers' comments and recommendations.
   • Accepted manuscripts proceed to the production process, while rejected manuscripts may be submitted elsewhere or revised and resubmitted for consideration.

7. Publication:

   • Accepted manuscripts are copyedited, typeset, and prepared for online publication.
   • Published articles are made available to the public through the journal's website or other distribution channels.

8. Post-Publication Evaluation:

   • After publication, articles may be subject to post-publication peer review and ongoing discussion within the academic community.
   • Authors are encouraged to engage with readers' feedback and provide clarifications or updates as needed.

9. Continuous Improvement:

   • The editorial team regularly evaluates and refines the peer review process to ensure efficiency, fairness, and quality in publication standards.

This peer review process aims to uphold the International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health Research's commitment to scholarly excellence, integrity, and contribution to advancing medical science and public health knowledge.